|
|
UI Design Update
Newsletter August, 2000
Insights from
Human Factors International

In This Issue
Bob Bailey reviews:
|
Human Interaction
Speeds
|
What
are typical human interaction speeds for reading, listening, speaking,
keying, and handwriting? |
| Human
Interaction Speeds |
| |
|
|
| |
|
As designers
make decisions among different input and output technologies, frequently
they must consider the speed with which users typically perform.
Many maximum human interaction speeds are summarized in my book,
Human Performance Engineering (Bailey, 1996, p. 42).
Over the past
couple of years, many studies were reported that have added to our
understanding of how fast people process information in real world
situations. These can be considered as "typical speeds." This information
can be very useful, but is difficult to find, and so I have summarized
some of it here.
|
 |
| 1.
Reading |
|
The average
adult reading speed for English prose text in the United States
seems to be around 250 to 300 words per minute.
This reading
speed can be substantially increased when using rapid serial visual
presentation (RSVP). People with little practice can read at 400
words per minute, while those with even less than one hour of practice
can easily read at speeds of 600 to 800 words per minute or faster
(Bailey and Bailey, 1999).
When people
are proofreading (scanning) text on paper they do so at about 200
words per minute. Performing the exact same task using a monitor,
they proofread about 10% slower at 180 words per minute (Ziefle,
1998).
|
 |
| 2.
Listening |
|
People comfortably
can hear words that are spoken at from 150 to 160 words per minute.
This is generally the recommended rate for those who are preparing
"books on tape," or for narration in videos (Williams, 1998).
However, when
normal speech is increased to 210 words per minute, using compression,
there is no loss in comprehension (Omoigui, N., He, L., Gupta A.,
Grudin, J. and Sanocki, E., 1999).
|
 |
| 3.
Speaking |
|
People tend to dictate to computers at about 105 words per minute
(Karat, Halverson, Horn, and Karat, 1999; Lewis, 1999). Even so, there
will be some mis-recognitions by the speech recognizer. After making
the required corrections, the speaking rate was reduced to an average
of 25 words per minute when doing transcription. New users had an
average speaking rate of 14 words per minute when transcribing, and
only 8 words per minute when composing (Karat, Halverson, Horn, and
Karat, 1999). |
 |
| 4.
Keying |
|
The fastest
typists can enter well over 150 words per minute. Many jobs require
keyboard speeds of 60-70 words per minute. However, when actual
typing speeds are collected for people that use computers, they
are much slower. In one study the typing rates for simple transcription
averaged only 33 words per minute, and for composition the average
was only 19 words per minute (Karat, Halverson, Horn, and Karat,
1999).
In this same
study, participants were divided into three groups according to
their typing skills. The fastest typists averaged only 40 words
per minute, those that had "moderate" speed averaged 35 words per
minute, and those that were considered "slow" typed at 23 words
per minute.
Two-finger
typists can key memorized text at about 37 words per minute, and
copy from one form to another at about 27 words per minute (Brown,
1988).
|
 |
| 5.
Handwriting |
|
On average, people write (handprint) at about 31 words per minute
for memorized text, and about 22 words per minute when copying text
(Brown, 1988). It is interesting that the original Remington typewriter
was sold with the promise that it would enable users to enter information
"twice as fast as they could write." |
 |
| References |
|
Bailey, R.W.
(1996). Human Performance Engineering: Designing High Quality
Professional User Interfaces for Computer Products, Applications
and Systems, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Bailey, R.W.
and Bailey, L.M. (1999), Reading speeds using RSVP, User
Interface Update - February 1999.
Karat, C.M.,
Halverson, C., Horn, D. and Karat, J. (1999), Patterns of entry
and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition
systems, CHI 99 Conference Proceedings, 568-575.
Lewis, J.R.
(1999), Effect of error correction strategy on speech dictation
throughput, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society - 1999, 457-461.
Omoigui, N.,
He, L., Gupta A., Grudin, J. and Sanocki, E. (1999), Time-compression:
Systems concerns, usage, and benefits, CHI 99 Conference Proceedings,
136-143.
Williams, J.
R. (1998). Guidelines for the use of multimedia in instruction,
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual
Meeting, 1447-1451.
Ziefle, M.
(1998), Effects of display resolution on visual performance,
Human Factors, 40(4), 555-568.
|
 |
3-day
Annual User Interface Update Seminar
presented by Dr. Robert Bailey
Suggestions, comments,
questions?
HFI editors at

|