HFI Usability Home

Usable. Experience. Design.

HFI Usability Home About HFI - Usability Experts Usability Consulting Usability Training & Certification Usability Tools & Standards Usability Newsletter Executives Only  

Contact Us | 1-800-242-4480

 
UI Design Newsletter
Current Issue
Past Issues
Reader Comments
Subscribe
Change Address
divider
HFI Webcasts
June 2008 Webcast
Upcoming Webcasts
Past Webcasts / Podcasts
divider
Ask Eric
Questions & Answers
Ask your question
divider
Readings
Published HFI Articles
White Papers
Intranet Standards
GUI Standards
Quantitative Usability
e-Commerce Usability
GUI Design
IVR
divider
Just Fun
Cartoons
Mouse Maze
10 Web Usability Tips
Usability Quiz
Web Usability Quiz
Contextual Innovation Quiz
History of HFI Buttons
divider
Resources
Accessibility
Bibliography
Usability Links
HCI Degree Programs

UI Design Newsletter – March, 1999

Past Issues | Print this page | Email this page

Insights from Human Factors International

divider line

In This Issue Bob Bailey reviews:

Breadth vs. Depth 1

Broader structures enable faster performance

   

Breadth vs. Depth 2

2 is the magic number

   
Breadth vs. Depth 1
   

Depth versus breadth in the arrangement of Web links, Zaphiris, P. and Mtei, L., (1998) original paper.

After arriving at your Web site, what is the maximum number of mouse clicks a user should have to make before getting to useful information?

Ever since Miller's totally misunderstood "7" article, people have been watching for another good number. Currently, one of the main candidates has to do with identifying the maximum number of mouse clicks. Is it 2, 3, 4 or the magical 7?

Zaphiris and Mtei surveyed the old "breadth and depth" literature related to menu design to determine whether it was better to have a few pages with a large number of links appearing on each page, or to have more pages with fewer links per page.

In general, the "breadth and depth" menu research suggests that it is better to have more items at each level, and fewer levels. In their study, they found the same. The fastest performance came from having a web site with two levels, i.e., requiring two clicks.

Breadth vs. Depth 2
 

Web page design: Implications for memory, structure and scent for information retrieval, Larson, K. and Czerwinski, M., CHI 98 Conference Proceedings, 25-32, (1998).

Larson and Czerwinski (1998) also considered the breadth and depth issues. They summarized the past research as finding that "most studies found that breadth was better than depth for organizing menu structure." In their study they compared web sites that had two levels with those that had three levels.

They reported that the 2-level web sites enabled reliably faster searches than the 3-level site.

It appears that the new magic number for system designers is "2".

Comment on this article
 
Name: *
Company:  
Email: *
Comment:  

Reader comments on this and other articles.

The HFI User Interface Design Update Newsletter discusses the latest research in the field of usability. To learn more about the practical application of recent usability research and how it impacts user-centered design, we invite you to attend our Putting Research into Practice course.

Past Issues